Originally Posted by Russ
(1) Math.

(Search for my post on the mathematical absurdity of evolution.)

(2) Logic.

As I said, RAZD's post is filled with assumptions and suppositions.

(3) Fossils.

Furthermore, the idea that, let's say, scales turned into feathers is absurd, and we have no record of this happening.

This kind of change is HUGE, ENORMOUS, EXTREMELY COMPLEX, but those with religious fervor for evolution belittle the complexity.

I think we can all agree that a creature with scales didn't give birth to a creature with feathers (hopefully) (even though the evolution spin doctors did attempt to pass this one off, but it was so obviously ridiculous to the populace, that they rescinded.)

So, let's ask ourselves, where are these intermediates?

(4) DNA

DNA is necessary for a cell to form and function.

So, where did this original DNA come from? How did this immensely complex, highly-formed, information-containing molecule come into being?

This is stuff you have posted before. What happened to addressing the evidence that RAZD supplied? If you know it is in error then provide us, "the uneducated masses", with the evidence you know about that shows RAZD to be wrong.

This repetition of the same-ole same-ole looks like a distraction instead of an addressing of the issues at hand. Didn't you say that people who use distraction are usually trying to foist a deception on everyone else and have no evidence supporting that deception?

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke