This post you made is a perfect example of information that is emotionally based.
Why?
Because, when you read it, it feels like you've really said something. It feels as if you've really presented some evidence to support your position.
It looks that way because he really did present evidence.
But...
When you look at the information with your intellect, it becomes clear that there is NO evidence here and NO information that supports the existence of transitional forms.
I did look at what he presented and now feel insulted by you in that you are saying I don't use my intellect. Are you calling me stupid? You have already stated that you believe I am lying about my Christianity. Untrue....I am not lying. So you have slandered me.
Then show his evidence to be false instead of just saying so.
People who covet the apparent emotional benefits of evolution are blinded so much, that they imagine the process of sacles turning into feathers or fins turning into feet.
This looks like emotional appeal right here. No evidence just a turn of phrase to make evolution look ridiculous. What are these extremely pleasing emotional benefits to believing evolution? Just one would be good enough for me as long as you can:
1. Show that it is a part of the theory.
2. Show that the coveting by these people has any bearing whatsoever on the truth or falseness of evolution.
BTW: I am not a coveteous person and your saying that I am is slander.
Anyone using true discerning intellect the amazing complexity involved in the myth of one form turning into another. Feathers are very complex. Feet and hands and arms are complex. Most of all, they are symmetrical, and no reasonable explanation of symmetry has ever been produced by fanatical evolution theorists.
Except HOX genes which you just ignored. Oh! Sorry, you didn't ignore that. You had a reply that, if boiled down to a few words, could be stated as: "Nuh uh!"
Intelligent and reasonable people not coveting a religion such as evolution (it's a religion because it's unobserved and requires faith and speculation) clearly see the absurdity in these outright silly ideas that claim that scales turn into feathers or fins turn into feet.
Now I'm apparantly unreasonable, unintelligent and an apostate as well as coveteous. More slander. I'm beginning to feel really insulted here.
Who was it that said "Those who cannot meet an discussion with facts will resort to character assasination"? Maybe that's not an exact quote.
Intelligent and reasonable people understand the sheer complexity involved in such a mythical process and they realize that design as such, requires a Designer.
I agree that a Designer did cause this to happen. He set up the process so that life and man would result. Unfortunately, I have no proof of this and must take that part on faith. The rest does not require faith.
A few simple questions: How do you measure complexity?
What are the units of measure for complexity?
At what measured level of complexity can can we conclude that natural processes could not have been the cause of the complexity?
Again, I urge people reading this previous post to attempt to pick out evidence from it. You will, in fact, only find speculation, fabrication, and imagination: The three pillars of the evolution religion.
I did look in your post but I only found speculation and imagination. I don't think there is fabrication because I take it that you believe what you are writing. However, I don't see how the things you wrote are a part of an evolution religion.
Oh! You meant those things were parts of RAZD's post....Sorry.
I don't see those in RAZD's post.
