You have been shown a number of times by a number of people here that this is a bunch of horsefeathers. "Russtolution" is a good description for the version of evolution you are attacking, because it has little to do with the real ToE. Just one example -- it's been explained to you how abiogenesis and ToE are different, yet you will not accept this. I told you that if anyone had said to you otherwise, they were in error. These videos you link to are full of inaccuracies and specific examples have also been pointed out to you.

If you want to carry on in this vein, and continually display your ignorance of the real ToE, that is your choice. What I take issue with is being told that evolutionists are "intellectually dishonest," and that this constitutes good reason for being banned. It looks to me like you are wanting to ban people who disagree with you because you are the one who sees the truth and others are lying. Ban all those who disagree with you and you'll have peace and quiet here, no strife, and a swell time too . . . by yourself, with the occasional visitor wanting to say "Yes, Russ, God be praised, you've got the answers man." I thought discussion boards were meant to serve as places for people to exchange different ideas.

You haven't addressed my point about "slander." Most of your comments here slander me, my friends and family, because we are evolutionists and some are scientists, and you constantly call us all liars. Yet you're willing to do this in order to prop up your own ideas about reality. The question again: what makes you so sure that you are being objective, rather than banning people simply because they do not agree with you? Don't you realise what your comments here look like to many people? Are you surprised that someone mentioned a tin foil hat? Do you not ever question any of your beliefs and ask yourself whether you've got things right? It's a healthy thing to do on occasion.