Project-Bluebeam-is-hiding-mecury-chemtrails-that-supply-dentists-who-build-transmitters-in-our-fillings-so-aliens-can-get-past-our-tin-foil-hats theory.
I am a conspiracy researcher, and you are obviously slandering my work in this statement.
You know, chemtrails, for example, are very real, and I am attempting to do a good work by exposing them to people and to help them realize what they can do to protect themselves.
These conspiracies are rooted in evil, and we, as Christians, are supposed to be the lights that expose evil, so to belittle this kind of research harms people.
I could care less about any other conspiracy
This world will soon be suffering greatly, and it's just that kind of apathy that has led us to this place.
How incredibly sad that a person proclaiming themselves a Christian would be unconcerned with exposing evil.
You should have grown up enough to know that nothing is self-evident
I've heard the "we just can't know anything" argument before.
The truth is, we can be sure enough of knowledge to build buildings, electronics, and to make drastic improvements to the quality of our lives.
In fact, everything we do that is above the level of "animal" is based on the understanding of knowledge and the prediction of how things will behave—that is—understanding the underlying rulesets.
Evolution is a lie that is at the root of much evil and propaganda.
Indeed yes...at least the ones that deal with evolution. The statements and "proofs" they make are so poorly supported, I find myself aghast at the fact that the audience remains in the room. I half expect to see them getting medical treatment for laughter induced broken ribs.
You are getting off the subject.
You asked for evidence of conspiracies because you rightly said that I keep diverting the conversation toward them.
The videos on the website DO provide evidence and first-hand witnesses, but these things alone are not intended to convince the skeptic. You have to do your own research, but I'm quite certain you will not.
Before I moved here, I had a 4-drawer filing cabinet packed full of evidence. I also had 2 8 1/2" x 11" binders with 3" rings full of copies that I had made myself from federal court decisions dealing with the topics of my studies. These copies were made on my personal trips to Federal Book Depositories, law libraries, and universities.
I have thrown 95% of this information in the trash because I realized that the people who really want to know, have everything they need. The people who don't know, don't know because they don't want to know.
I have decided to stop wasting my time trying to convince people of these things to the degree that I did several years ago, and I have made this decision because of the truth I discovered in the previous paragraph.
I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am a conspiracy researcher, and I HAVE done my homework (you have no idea).
So all I can say to you is that it saddens me that you have such a comical view of this information, that could otherwise be used to help and protect people from the difficult times to come.
Ignorance is both voluntary and dangerous.
Let's not spead it.When asked a simple question concerning the math and basis for determining relative probabilities, you jumped back into "self-evident" mode. Is that "intellectually honest"?
Um... You're censoring the part where I told you that I already had very long posts on this forum explaining these subjects and I told you how to find it.
Please, we do need to be honest here. Omitting this type of information only causes strife here, as does ridiculing my position as a conspiracy researcher.
It should not surprise you that you rarely convince anyone who was not a "true believer" before.
This is true, but not for the reasons you believe.
As I stated previously, people are emotionally-based. That is, they make decisions about what they believe based on their emotional feelings about it.
THIS is the true reason I don't convince people: They don't want to know.
Again, ignorance is both voluntary and dangerous.
The history in Genesis was written by people from a culture that did not require accuracy in the legends since those legends were for the purpose of teaching about God's character and attributes.
You are completely wrong, and this statement alone—in all due diligence—causes me to question your integrity.
The accuracy of the Biblical documentation was considered paramount throughout history. Those who study it know this. I'm sincerely not sure why you think differently, especially considering that you claim to believe that Christ is who He said He was.
If the documents are not accurate, than why would you have any reason to believe the account of Christ is accurate? Yes, I am asking for an answer.
How can you believe that the original manuscripts of the Bible were "without error" when the four Gospels don't match up in event timelines?
Actually, they do match up. Again, please provide evidence for your assertion.