If you'd like, I can dig up the posts where the maths you presented were discussed and answered. If I take the time to do so, will you then discuss it?

Again, I think you're simply glossing over people's posts here and not reading them. Which is why you didn't know LinearAq's religious background or that my user name is not an acronym or abbreviation (despite that both of these facts were mentioned many times, often specifically worded to you, Russ T); which is why Russell2 and Mordred had to point out your Darwin quotemine a half-dozen times before you bothered to react; which is also why you're claiming no one has answered your mathematical observations. It's not that they haven't answered, you're just not reading their posts.

I think the vast majority of the posters on this forum have long ago proven if you want to discuss a certain topic they're more than happy to reply to it. I can't help but get the feeling that you want them to be avoiding it, so that you cay say "Oh look, you're avoiding answering the questions, nyah nyah!". The unfortunate truth for you is that they're not avoiding these things at all. I can see the answers plain as day. Because I read what they have to say - thoroughly. Because I "do my homework". Do you do your homework, Russ T?

Regards,

Pwcca

In medieval English folklore, Puck was a malicious and wicked fairy. In Elizabethan folklore, he became a mischievous, brownie-like fairy, also called Hobgoblin or Robin Goodfellow. The Irish pooka and the Welsh pwcca are similar spirits.