|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
Would you consider a tangle of wire coat hangers to be complex. You know, the tangled mess that is sometimes found on the floor of a child's closet. What intelligence was required to put that together? Your example is not demonstrating complexity. It is demonstrating entropy, and in fact, is a solid argument for creationism. You are interpreting your observations with your emotions instead of your intellect—A very common mistake that enables a faulty type of reasoning (emotionalism) that is necessary to accept evolution. Not surprisingly, it is exactly the same type of emotionalized-reasoning that leads to religious fanaticism, such as evolutionism.Nevertheless...What I was saying is this: The LHC is complex. The LHC broke. There are a lot of smart ("intelligent") people working to fix it. Conclusion: Building and maintaining complex machines takes intelligence.
|
|
|
|
|