Dinosaur Shocker

An accessible article from Smithsonian.

Quote
Schweitzer, one of the first scientists to use the tools of modern cell biology to study dinosaurs, has upended the conventional wisdom by showing that some rock-hard fossils tens of millions of years old may have remnants of soft tissues hidden away in their interiors.


This would be a cool discovery, but I don't see why it has to mean that the fossil isn't old.

Quote
Meanwhile, Schweitzer’s research has been hijacked by “young earth” creationists, who insist that dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years. They claim her discoveries support their belief, based on their interpretation of Genesis, that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Of course, it’s not unusual for a paleontologist to differ with creationists. But when creationists misrepresent Schweitzer’s data, she takes it personally: she describes herself as “a complete and total Christian.” On a shelf in her office is a plaque bearing an Old Testament verse: “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”


Interestingly, the original findings are being contested. Another team of scientists, practising good science, decided to break open other fossilised bones from different fossils, to see if they also contained any soft tissue remnants. Turns out that these samples are possibly modern-day bacterial slime. The jury is still out:

Soft Tissue in Fossils Still Mysterious: Purported Dinosaur Soft Tissue May Be Modern Biofilms