You are lying about the nature of my responses. That is not allowed here.

I will tell you again, but this may be the last time.

The Bible does not contradict solid evidence. The fact is, much of the information that you have been fed as being "solid" evidence has been contrived in one manner or another.

I spent most of my life examining things more deeply than most, and as you look into a single matter of science, you surprisingly-often find a stack of lies, expertly contrived in just such a way to control your conclusions, and this, to the profit of somebody somewhere.

From the movies made about evolution to the "science" behind it, it is all based on huge, ridiculous assumptions and even much outright fraud.

This is not true of all science, but it is true of nearly everything I've delved into regarding evolution.

The denial of informational conspiracies in the information age is the faith of the fantastically naive.

To a person unversed in conspiracy study, this does not make sense, but to a person educated in this area, the world has become as predictable as any good science could make it.

The short of it all is this:

The Bible is the last large remaining threat to a global government. For this reason, the merchants of the Earth (bankers) have been attempting to destroy its credibility with great fury for the past century. They are having success, not because their arguments are true, but because:

(1) They control media, and

(2) People tend to believe what they hear in media.

To truly understand the world today, you must be willing to read and research information that contradicts your preferred religion. Not to is an exercise in intellectual dishonesty.

People have a tendency to covet. Coveting blinds people to the truth by coloring their perception. You are certainly not immune.

I do not debunk evolution because I am a Christian. I debunk it because it makes science look bad, and I love science.

I am a Christian for the following reasons:

(1) Bible prophecy
(2) Bible gematria
(3) Other Bible evidence, such as archeology

I have no emotional agenda when studying the Bible. My only interest is truth.

If I found evidence that the Bible was wrong (which I have many times), I would examine it. When I have, I have found the challenges to the Bible to be in error every time (so far).

I may be at an advantage over many because I build things, and have for a long time.

Particularly when you consider complex things, like embedded systems (small standalone computer systems) like the ones I used to design and build.

Making all of the parts of a complex system come together and work is a hard thing to do.

Most people have no idea of the number of small details that must be addressed when doing such things. People today often have the "hit the television on the side to fix it" mentality. Or they have the "just put it in the microwave" mentality.

In reality, things are much more complex than that, and as I have well learned, obscuring and ignoring complexity is something evolutionists do constantly. This is what I have found in my studies and is not intellectually honest.

So again I say, there is big difference between reading the Bible twice and "getting it"; A big difference.

Fortunately, and thank God for it, I got it, and now I share it out of love for others. Whether that love is gentle or tough, it is the kind of love the demands intellectual integrity and tells the truth.

So for this reason I say:

When you are asked to put a tattoo on your hand for the purpose of conducting commerce, remember this conversation.


Evolution is a social control. If you believe it, you are controlled.


"Today our duty is to destroy the myth of evolution, considered as a simple, understood and explained phenomenon which keeps rapidly unfolding before us. Biologists must be encouraged to think about the weaknesses and extrapolations that the theoreticians put forward or lay down as established truths. The deceit is sometimes unconscious, but not always, since some people, owing to their sectarianism, purposely overlook reality and refuse to acknowledge the inadequacies and falsity of their beliefs."

—Pierre-Paul de Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 8.