I thought I might just point out the obvious here.

Russ is refusing to engage with any of the particulars of the evidence on offer here, or indeed in any thread at the moment. He continues to repeat claims which have been refuted elsewhere several times over (e.g. the "mathematical absurdity").

What Russ is offering instead is arguments from ignorance with no acknowledgement of previous scientific and mathematical explanations; and the same old litany of unsubstantiated claims and wild conspiracy theories.

Wilful ignorance or blindness seems to be a common theme with creationists here. Why else would they so assiduously avoid addressing any scientific issues, and not provide evidence for their own claims? (No fossil record? OK. The earth is flat too, and unicorns live in the woods.)