|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Curiously this was NOT what the lecturer was talking about, so this does NOT validate the lecture in any way. Duh! As you'd already departed from what the lecturer was talking about, when I showed you wrong it still had nothing to do with what the lecturer was talking about. If your argument had been to the point, the fact that there is horizontal gene transfer would have also been on target. So your "counterargument" is a logical fallacy AND it is demonstrated to be wrong. Yes, as a joke, I committed the logical fallacy of accepting what RAZD said. Shame it went over your head. No. Logical fallacies don't require active refutation. By definition fallacies are bogus arguments. Curiously, we are not talking about refutation but about substantiation that the fallacy in question applies to the object of the argument. Since when? You just said And the way that you refute such fallacies is to demonstrate that the video in question is honest. Care to keep up with your own assertions? In fact, you didn't even need to scroll up; the nested quote was right there looking you in the face. Why don't you scroll up now and take a look. Better yet, why not discuss something on-topic?
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
