You're lying again, CTD:

Quote
Then to see him asking for help because he himself cannot imagine this.
This is not the first time you have made a completely false claim about me. I guess when you can't prove my argument wrong you have to falsify what I said eh?

Quote
You had to see RAZD go on and on about bats evolving.
Curiously, you have not shown a single thing about a single one of the various fossils NOT being intermediate in form, or in any way invalidated bat evolution from 75 Mya old shrew-like animals with homologous teeth and other shared traits with bats.

All you have are mockery and false representation. It's all you do, on and on, ad nauseum.

So how about raising your post level out of the gutter, drop the third grade attitude, and actually deal with the issue/s: fossils exist that are intermediate in form between ancestral fossils and descendant fossil, (whether they are bats, whales, foramins, horses, hominids, pelycodus, therapsids, fishibians, or whatever). They are, in fact, along the line of descent with transition from the ancestral form of organisms to the descendant form of organisms, the are by definition transitional fossils. As predicted by Darwin.

See if you can do that without misrepresentation and falsehood.

Enjoy.