|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Of course, CTD, What's strange is that you think you can convince folks "Some videos are dishonest, therefore all videos are dishonest" is anything other than a pathetic logical fallacy. And the way that you refute such fallacies is to demonstrate that the video in question is honest. No. Logical fallacies don't require active refutation. By definition fallacies are bogus arguments. His division of change in biological traits into horizontal and vertical is also a falsehood: genes are not transmitted horizontally but vertically from parent to offspring, the same exact process that results in speciation and the diversification of populations after speciation. Nonsense! For all your purported education and knowledge, you've never heard of horizontal gene transfer? http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Horizontal_gene_transferGet informed before you talk trash.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|