The basic problem with these types of conversations is that it nearly always comes down to deciding who you believe.

My position on evolution is that the science is as fraudulent as amalgam, vaccine safety, autism, herbal-dangers, and so on-and-on.

There are a group of powerful people who control nearly all of the information in the world today, including scientific information. All of these lies, such as about mercury and amalgam fillings, are promoted to achieve a social agenda.

Evolution is no different. It's not about science. It's not even scientific. It all about social engineering through propaganda and disinformation.

I could not care less how many people don't agree with me because I know two things:

(1) I've done my homework very well and know what is going on in these fields and in politics, and

(2) I know how many other people try to act like they've done their homework but have not (many).

My arguments against evolution are fundamental because evolution is fundamentally flawed. Unfortunately, fundamental lies are more effective than lies about analytical details. In evolution, analytical lies are told to support (prop up) a fundamental one.

Evolution is a lie so stupid:

(1) people often look at it,
(2) then they look at the number of people who are claimed to believe it,
(3) then they wonder if they are missing something.

This human attribute is personified in the story of "The Emperor's New Clothes".

Humans are really followers at heart. The problem is, those not following Christ are like the blind following the blind.