Originally Posted by RAZD
Really, CTD, I'm surprised you missed it.

Originally Posted by CTD
Nothing in the added text helps you guys. "When applied to biology, evolution generally refers to changes in life forms over time," is the only sentence that refers to 'evolution' in all that you added. That's a pretty "Duh!"/self-evident clarification.

Evolution = change
Biological evolution = biological change

I think folks could figure that out without redundancy, don't you?

The rest of the paragraph talks about "The Theory of Biological Evolution". You want to confuse the two and turn around and accuse me of confusing them. Bad strategy. Bad tactic. It's all bad. Please go there again.
It adds the context of what kind of change they are talking about. Here it is again:
...or what kind of evolution. It makes my case stronger when they continue to apply the same meaning, and use the terms interchangeably. Did you catch what R2 said, by chance? Did you catch the context of the discussion in which I quoted them?

Quote
What changes in what they are they talking about?
Or, what evolution are they talking about?
Quote
How do these changes arise?
Or, how does evolution arise?

Quote
What kind of time are they talking about?
Time is redundant. Without time, there is no change in the first place.

Quote
What they are saying...
It isn't hard to see what they're saying. Would you make it so? If you could pull it off, it might weaken my case.
Quote
ps - I thought you would like the article, as it went into the history of thoughts about evolution and the christian opposition to it way before Darwin. You like history eh?
Antihistory is like slapstick: Some is funny; Some is too dumb. This ain't the good stuff. There were a couple of fairly funny parts, but they were too few and far between.


Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson