Originally Posted by RAZD
Well CTD, another opportunity missed.

Quote
You quoted me saying the whale DNA story didn't match the whale fossil story, and this is true.
That was your opportunity to provide evidence showing that the DNA phylogeny differs from the fossil one, and that the whale DNA was totally different from any known organism (to count for falsification).
Rubbish!

You said
Originally Posted by RAZD
What does it predict about the genetic record? That it will match the fossil evidence for common ancestry exactly.
There is not an exact match for whales.

Quote
You may want to read further in the article I provided first.
What difference does it make that someone invents a story in an attempt to resolve the known mismatch? In order to match, they have to match up. Compromising one in light of the other isn't a match. Your own propaganda is evidence I am right. This would never had been written if the two "trees" had matched in the first place. Look again folks, if you've forgotten. When two things match, there's no need to revise one of them.

Will RAZD ever learn to evaluate links before presenting them?

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson