Hi CTD

Nothin' fake about evolutionists' "evidence".

What is it you think is fake about this evidence other than that you wish it were not true? The picture is an artistic reconstruction of what the fossil may look like with muscle and skin. The evidence is a well preserved fossil skeleton. Are you suggesting that someone made the skeleton? Evidence please?

Of course this is National Geographic, so I guess one's just supposed to take their word for it.

Why would you just have to take their word for it? If you are interested or dispute their descriptions you could go back to the original articles, they’re cited, or of course there is always the original evidence if you don’t believe the article. What part of this do you believe is fake CTD and on what grounds do you think so?

In Reason

Russell