Some may be thinking I overlooked the latter portion of RAZD's post. I just cut it up a little. Still not exactly bite-sized portions...
Originally Posted by RAZD
Can the theory be falsified by fossil evidence?

Yes: if we find a life form that cannot be explained by evolution through common ancestors from other organisms, it is just too different and there are no possible ancestors. A bipedal animal with an entirely different skeletal structure from all other known life would be an example.
Now this is funny. What has RAZD just described? *Answer below, so you can think about it.

Note that his "falsification" criteria is based entirely upon his capacity to imagine x or y or z. Actually it's worse. "Just too different" for him to claim there could have been x or y or z. He has already said he can't imagine a batcestor, but he can claim one existed anyhow.

Quote
What does it predict about the genetic record? That it will match the fossil evidence for common ancestry exactly.
Clear failure. The DNA whale ancestry and the fossil whale ancestry (both bogus, but that's not the point) don't match. This has already been demonstrated.
Quote
Can the theory be falsified by genetic evidence?
Ummmm... According to what you just said, one might think it clearly has.

But the bold words below indicate you intend to skate away from falsification
Quote
Yes: if we find a life form that cannot be explained by evolution through common ancestors from other organisms, it is just too different and there are no possible ancestors. An animal with an entirely different DNA structure from all other known life would be an example.
Again, you resort to nonsense. According to this, someone has to convince you personally, and make you confess that there could not possibly be an ancestor. That ain't science. That's a snowjob.

Quote
But those are highly unlikely events! That's not fair ...
Agreed.

Quote
Sorry, reality doesn't hand out favors ... nor is it ever "fair" to any belief.
As you just now spelled out yourself for everyone to see, this isn't about fair, or reality. This is an issue of your own personal credulity/incredulity. Nothing else. This is religion. No other term applies.

* Answer: RAZD has ironically described a :halloweenbat: bat.
"A bipedal animal with an entirely different skeletal structure from all other known life would be an example." I predict, even this will not suffice to shake his faith in evolutionism. Some part of him probably managed to inject this warning into his own words, but that part's buried pretty deep.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson