Actually, the practice of using quotes is common and used in many reputable books, newspapers/magazines. I realise that it's a hated practice, when one cannot control, edit and delete the past of some embarrassing/revealing statements, so the only alternative is to discredit the practice and those who ever decide to use them.

I have given quotes on this forum also and after a time, realised the drawbacks and tried to give the source, the names involved, the date and page number eachtime. I am well aware of the accusations against "quote mining", but also aware of the unfairness of "out of context" posting too. So at least when sources are given and identified, one can check up themselves.

So what you've stated here doesn't really apply in every instance. You obviously failed to make that clear...but then again, those who are interested can use the scroll bar and read the history on here themselves.

If done correctly, it is not a dishonest practice, and at times necessary one. Past statements unable to be edited are often the pet hate of the people in question. Their own statements used against them, as they continue to contradict themselves.....we do that on here to eachother, do we not?

Thankfully, as difficult as it sometimes is, the editing factor is limited and prevents us from changing out past posts after a certain time period. It maybe regrettable at times and embarrassing, but it is necessary.