Well, this was expected. I awaited this and here it is.

Linda, is this the best you can come up with in an attempt to discredit the owner of the website and the pictures? Since you guys have suggested on here that even your own hoaxes should not negate the rest of your apparent "evidence", why are you nit picking over a fishing lure or any apparently mistaken identity in regards to some fossils? And do you know of the intention of the owner in this regard? Are you suggesting him to be a fraudster and his material bogus?

And even if the apparent "fish lure" is true(can you put the picture up please?), you have used Dawkins of ALL people to "reveal" this (probably the last person I'd trust and one evolutionist that even you have admitted to not liking). The fossils are CLEAR to see for anybody and for the most part, are evident of what they are. If there are some that could be mistaken, that's expected. How on earth, with everything they dig up and find, to be able to nail it everytime? Or not make any mistakes? But whatever you attempt here, it certainly doesn't have much bearing on the rest.

You know, I had a few excuses that I predicted would be used by evolutionists on here and I missed this one, which I had originally intended to add. The attempt at discrediting the owner and/or his material. And here it is. Playing itself out, exactly as expected. The last resort? Or is there more?

Can you prove that these are in fact false and he is a fraudster....has it been proven officially? Or do you just buy into Dicky Dawkons because "Dicky said so"? And suddenly Dicky's comments become relevant and of interest to you you when it comes to this. What a surprise!

Have you the pictures of the particular fossil pictures you speak of?? Can you perhaps put them up here and label them for the mistakes they apparently are.

You know, it just amazes me that you're jumping up and down over a mistaken fish lure (if indeed this is so in the first place), when one wonders why you don't tend to do the same on your own team with the history of hoaxes?.....you know the official ones, which doesn't count the possibilities of others....