|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 644
Elite Member
|
What does this have to do with CTD's faulty math skills and inability to admit it when he is shown to be wrong? Thank you, LinearAQ, for weighing in on this most obviously untrue and insulting lie. I looked at the whole series of posts all the way back to where I showed you that your surmise concerning 1/2 lives and 1/4 lives was in error. I could find no post in which you admitted nor any post that showed you actually understand the equations concerning radioactive decay or interest calculations. From my point of view the statement I made is true. If you don't like it then stand up and disprove it. Show us where we misrepresented your posts concerning radioactive decay or interest calculations. Did you even notice where RAZD openly proved himself wrong in his last post, and brazenly posted the results in red? You'd think Bugs Bunny was one of the all-time most successful liars, the way RAZD emulates him. From what I saw in RAZD's post, his calculations and his statements about your mistaken representation of the interest rate formulas are all accurate. So either you are in error or you are purposely misrepresenting the application of the mathematics and skewing it to generate doubt about radionuclide decay dating methods. But the results are as transparent as can be. Anyone fooled by such gets exactly what they deserve. And a thinly veiled insult at the end...at least I wasn't surprised. What did Jesus say about calling your brother a fool?
A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
