Ironic that you call CTD's logic faulty.

He's the one that does not believe that random chance causes highly-complex, symmetrical, self-reproducing machines to form.

How is it that he reaches the correct logical conclusion through faulty logic and you reach myth through sound logic?

Evolution is an affront to science.


"Today our duty is to destroy the myth of evolution, considered as a simple, understood and explained phenomenon which keeps rapidly unfolding before us. Biologists must be encouraged to think about the weaknesses and extrapolations that the theoreticians put forward or lay down as established truths. The deceit is sometimes unconscious, but not always, since some people, owing to their sectarianism, purposely overlook reality and refuse to acknowledge the inadequacies and falsity of their beliefs."

—Pierre-Paul de Grasse, Evolution of Living Organisms (1977), p. 8.