As I said, I have explained this to you before on this very forum.
Since there are thousands of posts here, it would be nice if you would point to where you showed the probability calculations.
The math is so clearly self evident, that if you cannot see the improbability here, I cannot help you.
Is this the type of answer that you would give your child if he didn't understand his algebra homework? The least you could do is realize that everyone is not in the same league with you, either mathematically or logically.
Furthermore, I did demonstrate the math in previous posts, but no evolutionist was willing to touch it.
And that would be where...exactly?
"I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning, consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption . . The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do . . For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom."
I suppose this had something to do with the math behind the improbability of producing symetrical self-replicating machines using an error inserting process...but I just don't see it.
Evolution is nothing more than a social control. If you believe in it, you are the controlled.
This also seems a bit out of kilter for the topic at hand, but I don't have the steel trap logic that you wield so gracefully. Maybe you could make it another thread so we could discuss it in depth and I could understand how controlled I must be.
