CTD, these conversations between you and RAZD have become too lengthy for me to track thoroughly, but I have gone through his most recent post and yours. RAZD presented quite a lot of evidence for his claims, specifically about transitional forms. He identified the pattern you have shown throughout the forum of mocking things you clearly don't understand, and not giving evidence for your own position. Are you going to attempt to prove him wrong? Your entire previous post, as long as it is, is again nothing more than denial, semantic obfuscation, logical fallacies and lack of evidence to back up what you say. Why not pick just one of the pieces of evidence from RAZD's post and discuss it in a reasoned way? Or substantiate just one of your own claims?