Not true.

Micro-evolution (which is not evolution at all but a form of adaptation) expresses attributes that are already expressed in the genes.

So, there is all the difference in the world between the two. In fact, they are as different as creationism and evolutionism.

If you're going to be intellectually honest, you have to—at the very least—admit that science does not know if these expressions already exist. Your position is (again) based on mammoth assumptions.

My position is based on simple logical deductive reasoning, not observation, so please don't bother responding that my position contradicts itself.

[b]Redefining Evolution: The Grand Retreat Begins (video)[/b]
This is a 10-minute video demonstrating how the compliant media is working together with pop-science to rescue evolution. This video reveals the blatant retreat underway from evolution's original claims.


"The over-riding supremacy of the myth [of evolution] has created a widespread illusion that the theory of evolution was all but proved one hundred years ago and that all subsequent biological research—paleontological, zoological and in the newer branches of genetics and molecular biology—has provided ever-increasing evidence for Darwinian ideas. Nothing could be further from the truth."

—Charles Darwin, quoted in *N.C. Gillespie, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation (1979), p. 2 [University of Chicago book].


[b]Our Solar System: Scientific Evidence for Creation (video)[/b]
This video provides scientific information directly from a space sciences engineer that strongly evidences creation. He continues by providing statements by evolutionists that clearly reveal their inability to reconcile even the most fundamantal scientific information regarding our solar system. An excellent video for all to watch.