You are right, Russ. And if people would just start to think and not just believe everything they have been taught, they couldn't help but see that there is no way such a complex creature as man could ever evolve. While waiting for certain features to evolve over bazillions of years, the creature would be dead from not having that certain feature, esp. when we notice how all organs work together and need to work together. And, I have noticed that when things are left to themselves, they tend to go to disarray - not to more complexity. How many defective genes today are helpful to the organism as opposed to how many are detrimental? Most, if not all, damaged (changed) genes are detrimental. Therefore, how could we have the complexity of the animals and man that we have today if the great majority of gene changes are detrimental? I am not saying that there are not changes iwithin species due to dominant and recessive genes, (ie light and dark moths on trees in country and industrial areas) but that one species does not change into another. If one species changed into another, we should have more missing links in the fossil records than anything else! Where are the missing links? Think!