Science works by accumulating verifiable data, testing hypotheses, and developing theory that best accommodates the data. As a process, it is always open to new data and amendments to the theory, and even wholesale revisions of existing theory. At its best, it is done openly and with a great deal of conversation. The thrust of this thread is to discuss the evidence against the current state of evolutionary theory for explaining the development of the diversity of organic life. You have provided no reports or data that can be better explained by the conjectures of intelligent design, only rhetoric. At present, evolutionary theory is the best option.