Science lays no claim to being conclusive about anything, it just claims to have the best explanation for the evidence we know about, according to the knowledge we have, and it is subject to change by (a) developing a better explanation, (b) uncovering new evidence contrary to such explanation, or (c) developing new knowledge that looks at things in a different way.
RAZD has on more than one occasion presented conclusions of evolutionists as facts. Obviously evolutionism is not science, according to his own standard.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth
"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm
"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson
"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
