Thank you for correcting your fellow evolutionist. I suppose it's only fair to allow him time to spot & correct some of the mistakes in your post.
Looks like I will have to wait for him since you won't address the parts of my post that corrected you.
It makes one think that you cannot refute the fact that I smashed your implication that radioactive decay curves are mathematically manipulated to match what evolutionists want. Of course that's not really fair on my part since I took advantage of your lack of knowledge concerning mathematics.
That was the cause of your mistake, right? I mean, your lack of skill in setting up a proper mathematic model of the real life situation even though you were already given the formula that modeled the behavior, right?
That has to be it, because otherwise that would mean you were purposely misrepresenting the mathematics model of radioactive decay in order to score points with those who don't know better.
I'm sure you would not violate your faith's high standards just to look like a winner on a web forum.
