|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 449
Advanced Master Member
|
Hey LindaLou, Polonium radiohalos (not a new subject, I've seen it discussed in other places) . . . how much do you understand about them? I understand very little, and I will be honest about that because this sort of detailed knowledge of chemistry and radioactive decay is difficult for me to grasp and I have no background knowledge of it to help me. Please address your question about this to RAZD, when you are finished discussing the other points about radioactive decay. This argument ( Pratt Claim CF201) assumes there is no source of modern Polonium. The problem for Creationists that use this example, though is to explain the existence of Uranium Halos: From Dr Wiens: 13. "Radiation halos" in rocks prove that the Earth was young.
This refers to tiny halos of crystal damage surrounding spots where radioactive elements are concentrated in certain rocks. Halos thought to be from polonium, a short-lived element produced from the decay of uranium, have been found in some rocks. A plausible explanation for a halo from such a short-lived element is that these were not produced by an initial concentration of the radioactive element. Rather, as water seeped through cracks in the minerals, a chemical change caused newly-formed polonium to drop out of solution at a certain place and almost immediately decay there. A halo would build up over a long period of time even though the center of the halo never contained more than a few atoms of polonium at one time. "Hydrothermal" effects can act in ways that at first seem strange, such as the well-known fact that gold--a chemically un-reactive metal with very low solubilities--is concentrated along quartz veins by the action of water over long periods of time. Other researchers have found halos produced by an indirect radioactive decay effect called hole diffusion, which is an electrical effect in a crystal. These results suggest that the halos in question are not from short-lived isotopes after all.
At any rate, halos from uranium inclusions are far more common. Because of uranium's long half-lives, these halos take at least several hundred million years to form. Because of this, most people agree that halos provide compelling evidence for a very old Earth. (bold mine for emPHAsis) And this again comes back to the basic problem for all Young Earth scenarios: it is easy to find evidence of young things in an old earth, but how do you explain the evidence of old things in a young earth? Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|