I just don't see how Biblical prophecies can be considered as concrete proof of the inerrancy of the Bible by anyone other than the fundamentalists who see them as such.

No one, for example, has commented on the article I linked to which raises questions about prophecies being written after the fact, coincidences, interpretations of wording, etc. And there are Biblical prophecies which were not fulfilled.

Some other problems are outlined here.

Also, no one has explained why Biblical prophecies are true while other religious prophecies, such as those of Hinduism, are not.

It is of course your choice to read Biblical prophecies as proof for whatever you like. Offering them as "proof" for other Biblical claims, such as literal creation, is more problematic, though I don't see that anyone has explicitly attempted to do so here (yet).