I didn't know that anyone had shown RAZD's evidence/conclusions were inaccurate. Besides the one place where you showed his statement was wrong, and he acknowledged it, you have not even provided a substantive rebuttal to any of his statements about the Grand Canyon.

For the record, I don't consider the following statements in and of themselves to be substantive rebuttals:
1. "That just shows how little you know"
2. "Of course you're just building a strawman"
3. "That's not right"
4. "Nuh-uh!!"

I understand that this forum was made by and is mainly a soapbox for anti-evolutionists. However, do you really think it advances your cause when you use all these poor debate tactics and atrocious logic? Couldn't you at least attempt to display the knowledge and evidence that you say you have?

Please address the issues under discussion. You say that RAZD is practicing character assassination against you, but I don't see it as anything other than an extremely blunt description of what you are actually doing.