Not always. Disease and chemicals can alter this beyond those laws.
Are you saying that disease organisms and chemicals don't follow the rules of chemistry? What rules do they follow, then?
This is more of an explaination of the suruvival of the fittest. Where domanace rules the game, and only those genes get passed on. But that is not always true as it has been observed where non-dominant males have neen able to mate and pass on their genes.
Since the effect of changes in the environment on the distribution of physical traits within a population is micro or macro evolution, that is the correct explanation of the "rules". If you feel this does not adequately answer your question, please rephrase it so that I can understand what you want explained.
A viable scientific theory should not only be able to show our past, present, but also make predictions on where we are headed. There are no existing models that even touch on making predictions the evolution of any life form to what it will become.
That's because we don't know what possible changes will occur in the physical traits of all the organisms on the earth. There are predictions about changes in the distribution of life, in a general sense, due to global warming. Basically, where the environment changes, those organisms with the traits that supply an advantage in the new environment...will survive. It's goodbye to the rest.
And we have yet to see any life form evolve into another kind of life form.
I cannot address this in it's present form. Please clarify:
1. By "life form", do you mean an individual organism or a population of organisms?
2. Please define the phrase "kind of life form" as you mean it in this sentence.
There is no such thing as a "highest point" since evolution has no particular direction.
Then you guys don't know as much as you think you do. Answering questions with broad answers only shows how much less is actually known about evolution.
I don't see how your reply addresses my comment. Do you mean that there is a part of the Theory of Evolution that details the direction it is supposed to be going in? Please provide more details on what you know about this.
Has any life form become a different kind yet? I'm not speaking of speciation. Where a bird can become a different bird. Because kind creation allows this as long as it stays a bird. But when has a bird, or anything else, become a non-bird?
Please provide the defining characteristics of a "kind". I cannot provide the evidence that a new kind has evolved from a different kind unless you provide a description of the boundaries of a kind.
