Yet every time I ask you to explain how uranium dates for the erosion of the canyon are wrong, the question is answered by dead air. This is a curious comment from you, considering the evidence RAZD has given in the Grand Canyon thread as to why geologists say the Grand Canyon is old, was gradually uplifted over a long period of time, and has been carved by a river and not a flood. Please explain how these are "cockeyed stories." We'd really like you to, we keep asking you to.