I've shown you some details of what we know about the specific prints you were referring to, and I showed you the steps in my reasoning.

Instead of explaining why you disagree, you have employed what appears to be a typical tactic of ad hominem and cries of how the methods used to assess your claims (logic and the scientific method) are unfair.

I had expected more than "boo-hoo" in response but maybe my hopes were a little high.