1) Trying to show that the same standard that you guys want creation to meet, you cannot meet yourselves (double standard).

2) There is and never will be "any evidence" The evolutionist run science will ever accept as evidence for creation. Right?
If it's freasible, then the person either lied, frauded it, or carved it, right? Even though past evolution frauds are okay.

So guess what. I'm not wasting my time putting up any evidence for creation that will be shot down unscientifically with unfounded claims.

Example: When the dino and human prints were found together in the paluxt river. What was the very first rumor the evolutionist started and the news media picked up on? That some creationist that lives near by, went out in the dark of night and carved those prints. And that my friend was a bald face lie. Why?

1) No wittness was ever prodiced that saw the alleged crime.
2) It is a federal offense to deface government owned property.
3) the slab it was found under weight several tons. How did he move it by himself, then carve the print and move it back?
4) There was no court case ever heard on this. Not even one charge brought up against accused person for doing the federal offense.

http://paleo.cc/paluxy/wilker6.htm

So I guess when it comes right down to lying for evolution, it's all okay as long as you win, Right?