Quote
Yes, I've been so affected by what he says that I no longer reply to ... oops?

ikester is good at dishing out insults, I agree, but that doesn't make a good argument and that doesn't mean he can debate the issues any better than CTD does.

And if insult is the only response he has to facts that show a concept to be invalid, then perhaps it is best that he remain silent.

Enjoy.


Well RAZD, depends on what you consider insults. Are they insults if they are deserved, and provoked or long past due? I feel it's become a touch more fair recently.

No longer 4 to 1. You can read past most of the insults if they are just the typical bites, but not so easy when you find yourself having to get on and stand up against slander.

What you consider "no evidence", may not be shared by the readers. It's always a wise move to remind readers on here to use their brain and go read posts from the beginning themselves, rather than take "someone's word for it". And hey, if you're correct? The posts will speak for themselves, without requiring you to 'say so'.