Ikester. I'm unsure why anybody would be fooled. The snide remarks, false accusations and all the other tricks played are dotted throughout this forum and have indeed provoked similar or angry retorts (and rightly so).

Just to let you know. Russ (the owner) and Laura both have had to face Linda and cut her down about her false accusations (bordering on slander) on this forum. So no, hopefully nobody is fooled.

False claims of "Christians" on here were made by Linda on (I think the bible thread) that had us apparently referring to her as "dumb" and telling her she was going to hell. She knew full well it wasn't myself, Russ, or CTD who had made such claims, but she does it hoping others will think we have. Until she's faced, then she tends to back down a bit or claim "well it wasn't you".....then you wonder "then where and whom and how was it said"?????

I seem to recall that Pwcca used some sarcastic reference on here about name calling (from our side) towards Linda (pig) .....I'd like to know, where/when have we ever said such a thing to Linda (or anybody)? Do they hope that it'll go unnoticed and they can continue to make these statements hoping readers will assume we have been involved in stating such things?

Problem is, if this behaviour is not exposed, the continuation of attempting to discredit and destroy our reputations on here will be left unaddressed.

Ikester, before you arrived on this forum, CTD was a rather lone voice and copping quite a bit from the 4 of them at onetime. Whatever complaints they all had, they all felt the need to gang up on one person. Linda was COCK OF THE HOOP, absolutely revelling in it and even making statements that creationists run away because of the evidence..etc etc...enjoying it thoroughly.

Suddenly you come on here and give a little of what's been dished out and naturally you are not liked for it. But I feel it's unfortunate that someone has to do this, but in a sense, it's LONG overdue. I actually had to get on and stand up for myself, because even absence was being used to make false statements....this of course was intended to make us all look bad, until I got on and once again reminded Linda that this forum has never been heavily trafficed, most on these forums are here for health reasons and if she really preferred a forum with more traffic, she could go there instead. But she won't. I had to pretty much explain why I don't tend to engage much in the debates of such topics on here nowadays, as it takes a lot out of me to put together the information and make sure it's done as well as I can (a bit like typing essays). It really is tiring and stressful sometimes.

Then she stated it wasn't me she had aimed it at....then who? Since creationists apparently all run away from evidence, I wonder who or what forum she's referring to? If off-topic personal debates are not wanted...then tell me why it's instigaged and provoked?

I'm just glad you joined Ikester, because though CTD didn't seem bothered at all by them, he was still one creationist mainly battling 3 or 4. I felt that the forum could do with another passionate creationist interested in this topic enough to engage them and give as good as they dish out. Because frankly, CTD would be going it mostly alone. Unless another creationist had as much interest to join in the subject of these debates.

We all know is not uncommon in debates for unpleasant comments and emotions, but please be careful of the slanderous statements you may find yourself on the end of or having words put in your mouth that you had never even stated. Because once you respond in like manner? Then you'll be accused of that and it'll be used against you as well.