OK, let's imagine you are going to sub for a science class in which evolution is being taught.

You are going to say that it is "just a theory" and that there are other competing ideas, which gives some weight to those ideas. I'm not sure what else you would say; it obviously depends on you individually, and the state laws.

As we have so far seen in the debates here, there is a lot of evidence for evolution having occurred. What have you offered in way of supporting creationism? How exactly does it compete with evolution as a theory which explains the fossil record and the geological column?

Until creationists can make a solid case for creationism being scientific and a viable alternative to evolution, it does not belong in science classes, and it should not be given weight as a competing theory.

I am quite serious in asking creationists here to do just this -- show me why creationism should be taught as a competing theory to evolution. Show me why it merits a place in school curricula other than in religious classes. Can you?