Except a few logical problems, ikester.

Quote
(3) invalidation test: Find more current evidence that people minds are altered by evolution to kill those less evolved.
You've introduced new elements that are not in your "theory" and showing them won't affect the theory. This is a false structure and not comparable.

points introduced:
peoples minds being "altered"
that some organisms are "less evolved" than others.

This last one is contradicted by the ToE: all organisms alive today are the result of the same amount of evolution, they all have different traits than previous populations.

Quote
(1) observation: Hitler kills Jews and uses evolution as one of his excuses.
But not all of his excuses. Going from "one of" to "all of" is a logical fallacy.

Plus anyone can use a theory as an excuse for bad behavior, that doesn't mean that the theory of evolution led Hitler to kill Jews.

Quote
(2) theory: Evolution is a theory of death.
The ToE is a theory about life as well as death: without continuation of life there is nothing to evolve, and without differential success in survival and reproduction no traits would be selected. When you kill all of a population without regard to traits in the population there is no evolution.

I know you are unhappy, but the facts are the facts, and reality never promised to fit your opinion or belief. In science when the facts show a concept to be invalid it is discarded and science moves on, no matter how much the concept was treasured.

Enjoy.