|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
I was quite honest when I said you should get a little backbone. You were being asked to back your statements up with evidence. And what evidence would you accept? Lay it out in terms we can understand because so far you have more or less implied that all creation evidence is fraudulent. And that we all lie because we use fraudulent evidence. So what is good evidence to you? Either you possess keen insight, or you've been scouting. LindaLou doesn't even accept her own sources when they say things she's disinclined to hear. One clear case starts here: http://herballure.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=29319#Post29319To this day, she behaves as if she cannot even see the problem. ...and whines about the term 'evogoggles'.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
