Hi CTD

What I see clearly from you, time and again, is that you try very very hard to avoid actually engaging with ToE when it is presented to you. Can anyone reading this see any point of ToE that CTD has actually, successfully, engaged with? How many of his posts actually get into what ToE says as opposed to nit picking at perceived inconsistencies with it’s presentation?

You want me to write evotheories? What's it pay?

In science the normal practice, if you have a problem with a theory is to come up with a better one. If you have problems with the current theory but you can’t better it then you haven’t advanced our understanding very much. Even a flawed theory is better than having no idea at all how something works. Can you do it? It doesn’t have to be an “evotheories” whatever that is just a tenable explanation for the observed facts of evolution that we see around us. Oh and most importantly it has to explain these things better than the current scientific theory. Can you do it?

Not a lot of effort went into Skunk Funk, but it's proven its worth.

It was pretty obvious that you didn’t spend much time on it, it all unravelled pretty fast once questioned though as an obfuscation tool it seems to have value, what other use it has I have no idea.

And Occam's razor favors it, you understand.

You’ll have to explain that one to me. Sr William did stipulate that the theory had to work not just that it had to be simple. While Skunk Funk certainly scores on the second it fails miserably on this first requirement.

If you think I have confused you with someone else could you please point out, from the posts above, where you have actually engaged with what ToE says as opposed to nit picking at the exact explanations given here for it. You claim to understand it but you’ve shown no ability to demonstrate that to date I would suggest.

I shall continue to allow evolutionists to define evolutinism by their actions. It is the only honest and fair course of action, is it not?

Perfectly fair and reasonable but will you do me a one favour, once they have done so will you actually show us that you understand what has been said and engage with the ideas put rather nit picking at the wording of the definitions until we all die of old age. If a particular point is not worded clearly enough for you ask someone to clarify until you can understand what we’ve been saying. You claim time and again to understand ToE so that shouldn’t be too hard for you.

In Reason

Russell