Hi CTD
...What people here, people who really want to understand should note is that CTD never actually engages with what ToE says.
What everyone cannot fail to notice, including you, is that I've offered a foolproof method. Actions speak most clearly. The problem you have with my method is its clarity and certainty - why not just admit it.
He spends a great deal of time nit picking wording and vague disagreements between parts of this version and parts of that version and the motives of historical figures in this debate.
Scroll up & see how few posts I wasted on the nonsense. No great deal of time was involved. When the amusement value dropped low enough, I offered a solution.
If ToE was so untenable wouldn’t you think he could show some actual flaws in what the theory says?
Which one? One cannot even begin to discuss a version before RAZD produces a new one. More of the spam strategy. But they can't pick a winner. Natural selection cannot create a winner for them. It can only kill that which is presented to it. Until they produce a winner, the losers just keep dying. Unlike life, which cannot reproduce when dead, loser ideas inspire more spam.
If it were so untenable wouldn’t you think he could come up with a viable alternative, one that fits with the evidence we have already?
You want me to write evotheories? What's it pay?
He has made only a few very feeble attempts to do so to date that I am aware of.
Not a lot of effort went into Skunk Funk, but it's proven its worth. And Occam's razor favors it, you understand.
The above work from CTD is a classic example of creationist obfuscation. He has managed to avoid engaging with any of the real issues while throwing enough light weight shrapnel into the air that no one here, even if they seriously wanted to understand what is going on, would have any real chance of doing so. It’s a classic example of the style. Throw out 100 complaints, all easily refuted, and move on.
I think you're confusing who's who. My posts say "CTD" in the column to the left. It's blue and underlined.
Can you please try something for me CTD? Can you try to work with us to gain an understanding of what ToE says?
I already have. My method allows all evolutionists to participate. Thanks for your generous contributions, BTW.
I would dishonour the efforts of evolutionists if I change my policy. For that, and a number of other reasons, I shall continue to allow evolutionists to define evolutinism by their actions. It is the only honest and fair course of action, is it not?
