|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
Graduate Member
|
Actually, she only claims that the creationist that should know better are liars...the jury's still out on you. I did not know I was being charged of a crime. So who is the prosecuter? All the evolutionist here? And who is the accuser, all of the evolutionists here? The wording of your posts tells more about you and your friends then you ever know. And I also know the game being played here. It's a childish game played by people who cannot win the debate so they resort to the childish tactics and have others join in for support to try and make the person they disagree with look like they stand alone. The creation theory is not so weak that we have to resort to such tactics to make ourselves look good in front of an audience of lurkers that have been invited to lurk at this forum while you guys put on a show. Then go back to your forums and laugh at how you guys made a fool of every creationist at this forum. These people, Hovind, Morris, Austin and their ilk have been shown to quote people out of context, purposely misrepresent geologic samples in order to get erroneous readings, and ignore evidence they, themselves, have gathered in order to put forth their conclusions regarding the age of the Earth and Origins. So, if they are not lying about their "research" then they are blind. Shall I make a list of evolutionists who do the same thing? I guess when you cannot debunk the evidence then you have to attack the credibility. It's the only option left and is quite lame. Maybe you should start a lame thread on attacking the credibility of all creationists. So that you and all your friends can join in on the hoopla of hate. The rest of your post is pretty much worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
