Well how does it feel when what you imply with just about every post (creation are liars) is served back to you? You don't like it do you?
Actually, she only claims that the creationist that should know better are liars...the jury's still out on you. These people, Hovind, Morris, Austin and their ilk have been shown to quote people out of context, purposely misrepresent geologic samples in order to get erroneous readings, and ignore evidence they, themselves, have gathered in order to put forth their conclusions regarding the age of the Earth and Origins. So, if they are not lying about their "research" then they are blind.
So what you imply here is that every evolutionists tells the truth no matter what? And that all the frauds from the past were just misunderstandings?
Not her claim at all. In fact, I cannot see how you could draw that conclusion unless you were trying to add an emotional aspect to your response. Are you implying that the deceptive actions of some people who adhere to a belief, necessarily affects the truth or falsehood of that belief?
I can admit that creationists lie from time to time. But I doubt you can admit that evolutionists do the same. So by what written moral standards do evolutionists live by that is so much better than any standard out there that they can deem that what they say has more truth than anything else?
Some evolutionists live by the standards of the Bible. Some live by the standards of the Koran. Some by the standards of the society in which they live. In all cases, as is probably true with creationists also, they do it imperfectly and are prone to mistakes on occasion.
As to the truth of what they say, that depends on how much it has been corroborated by others in their field (assuming you are referencing their scientific conclusions).
So you would deny that pressure and super heater water would make the coalification process work much faster?
No. I would say that the rapid formation of coal in one instance does not mean that all or even a significant portion of the coal on the Earth was formed rapidly.
But...let's take your all-the-coal-on-the-Earth-was-formed-rapidly theory as a possibility. You say that high pressure and superheated water could form the coal. ok Please describe the process by which this happened all over the world in a short span of time. A simple explanation is fine with me. Just a description of the following:
1. Where did all the plant matter come from that formed the thick layers of coal we see today?
2. How did the plant matter get to the high pressure area where the superheated water was?
3. Approximately how much superheated water was needed to form all the coal we see?
4. What was the time frame in which this coal was formed?
5. Where did the superheated water go after it had done its job?
6. What are the telltale signs within the coal deposits that shows it was in contact with superheated water?
Maybe it would be more understandable from a lying creation video that shows where coal can be made in less than a year? Nah, you just say he was lying, correct? So I say you are too.
No. I would ask the researcher to show how the means used in the rapid creation of coal can be applied to the miles-thick seams of coal throughout the world. I would also ask what effect the application of that method, in the magnitude necessary to make all the coal in the world, would have on the rest of the planet.
You know bones cannot talk. They do not tell stories of their past. All that science really has is age dating and a line up of simuliar looks and DNA. The actual claims cannot and never will be verified (sound familiar?). And the actual process can never been seen because quote: It takes to much time.
There goes the science of forensics. I knew that those CSI programs were all fake.
Question: Is "everything" that comes against evolution a lie? If so, then evolution has graduated to being an absolute and is no longer a theory. So you cannot deem all things a lie because you "want" evolution to be true. That is not science.
Everything that comes against evolution is not a lie. It could simply be unintentionally untrue. That would make it a mistake...not a lie.
