If you look at what I said, I said you do make a lot of ad hominem remarks. I've ignored these for the most part and have pulled out points which seemed to be relevant to the topic under discussion. Since you've come here you've graced this forum with some long passages about how evolutionists are evil, ungodly deceivers. This has something to do with the topic of evolution, or science in general . . . how? And why would you expect me to respond to these kinds of comments? I'm not interested in name-calling, it's a pointless waste of time.

In all honesty I asked you to let me know if you feel I omitted something which you think is important. If you would rather play childish games of "I'm not paying attention to you" then you're going to run out of evolutionists to talk to here, which would put you in rather an odd position.

It would really be refreshing if our conversations could focus on the subjects themselves, and evidence. You seem to get very caught up with emotions and wanting to demonise evolutionists including those here with whom you've only been speaking (or purportedly ignoring) for a few days. Like I said, I don't know why you're so angry, but instead of taking it out on us here maybe you'd like to try having a civil, respectful debate? If the whole subject gets you so worked up, why do you seek out more of the kinds of people you seem to hate in order to get into more disagreements with them?