Ikester, it would be helpful if you could make your claims about "kinds" in one of the threads about the ark. The one about "how did Noah fit all those animals on the ark" would seem appropriate. Otherwise, as has been the case here many times, comments on other subjects get lost in the shuffle. This may be why you seem to be finding it tricky to discover past conversations here about subjects you are raising. The "search" facility here can be helpful.

Quote
Does not evolution also speak of the evils of Christians?


Man, I'm just in awe at the chip you've got on your shoulder. Going around with so much anger inside of you can't be pleasant. You of course are aware that evolution is the change in hereditary traits over time. So no, it does not speak of the evils of Christians. In fact, the last poll I looked at said that 40% of US scientists were theists. Most of them, being in the US, will be Christian.

Quote
If you think not I can leave several links to evolutionist sites and forums that will correct that.


No thanks, I'm not interested in people exchanging hate messages. Maybe you've encountered some and maybe that's why you're so angry, I don't know. I'm sure there are immature evolutionists out there just like there are other immature people. But there's certainly no need for it, because comments with evidence are all that's required in a debate. In my experience it tends to be creationists who stray away from this and get frustrated because the evidence isn't there to support them, but any creationist willing to present evidence for their views here is quite welcome to do so and I'd eat my socks if any evolutionist here reacted in anger.

Quote
Separating the parts of creation that make creation what it is, is like me telling you that you cannot speak about millions of years of time, or abiogenesis while expressing how evolution works.


What do you mean by "separating the parts of creation"?

Abiogenesis is a separate theory from evolution. We can see a great deal of evidence that life has evolved. That's the pure and simple, and it's still going on today. If abiogenesis were falsified it would not change the fact that we have evidence of life having evolved. It is possible that life started with self-replicating molecules but you're welcome to speculate as much as you like. Abiogenesis does not yet have the volume of evidence supporting it that evolution does; a lot of work is still to be done in that area.

Quote
Also I have notice that even though I make sure to try and answer every point in your posts, you do not do the same with mine. So either you show me the respect I show you by answering each part, or like you I will ignore most of what you say.


You really are a charmer, thank you very much smile

Actually, I have a new teaching job starting in 3 weeks' time and I have 9 classes to prepare. I also have a daughter to look after during the summer holidays. Forgive me if I can't spend hours addressing every point in your long posts. I don't feel a need to address long spews of ad hominem remarks for a start. But if you'd like to try to be a little more succinct, I will do my best to respond to what you say, and do let me know if you feel I've missed out anything important.