Just to keep you in form ikester7579 ....
I guess this is to much for any evolutionist to debunk. O well.
No, it was just too hilarious the first time.
The basic fallacy is that science claims that the oil made from old plant material normally occurred over long periods of time, due to the process involved, not that long periods of time was necessary for oil to form.
All you need is a different process.
What do we have on your video? A different process.
Therefore making oil quickly does not invalidate the evidence that the oil made from old plant material normally occurred over long periods of time, due to the process involved.
There is nothing to "debunk" except the logical fallacies where (1) the results of one process were equivocated with the results of another process and (2) the false straw man that science claims (all) oil (always) takes millions of years to form.
Science in fact is looking (hard) for ways to make oil, as there is a lot of money to be made were this to be accomplished .... without using more energy than the synthetic oil produces (one of the problems with corn ethanol).
One of the successes is synthetic oil used for lubricating motors now: it is better than the "natural" oil. Have you tried synthetic oil in your vehicle ikester?
Enjoy.