|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
Hi Jeanie
If you believe that we evolve new characteristics as we go along then we are in agreement. That was my point. The views that evolution is not inventive and that we came from just two individuals are incompatible. One or the other must be false. According to their statements here CTD holds one view while Russ holds another so I was interested to find out how they reconciled these views.
Russell While I wouldn't dispute that Russ holds different views than I do, I'm not aware of any clash, let alone incompatibility among the views we've stated on this forum. What's incompatible is Russell2's evolutionism. It's totally incompatible with the views we share. This is hardly newsworthy. The insightful will be expecting more attempts to redefine "evolution". RAZD has a thread devoted to that endeavour, and I have posted my best solution to the issue. If any would care to gainsay it, well, there it is.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
