|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 323
Master Member
|
As usual, I hold a slightly more eccentric view of creation, but I don't hold to it dogmatically. Both have their points worth pondering.
I do believe that the "Angels" view of Genesis 6 lends itself to an old Earth. Hey again Russ. If the words of Genesis 6 seem to be at all indicative of an old Earth then does this mean you accept the idea that the Grand Canyon is indeed as old as geologists claim it is? I guess what bemuses me about this concept that the Earth is only 6,000 years old is that it means all the clay tablets, scrolls, sarcophogi, etc. from ancient civilizations (that is, the ones predating 4,000 BCE) would have to be frauds. It means much of what my home library regarding numerous ancient peoples is all to be falsified.
|
|
|
|
|