Quote
Wow, that's quite a post.


I'm happy you understand part of where I'm coming from.

Quote
The problem that I see here is the basic assumption that all scientists are liars who have a conspiratorial agenda. You believe this so fervently that you have already written more about this assumption than, I hazard to guess, the combined total of other creationists here, and that's saying something.


You should have really asked instead of assume this. I believe that many people in science are decieved. I don't believe that all lie on purpose. Let me quote an interesting verse from the bible about this.

jas 4:17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.

Knowledge of sin is what makes sin a sin. If a person does not know he is being deceived, then his deception he would be innocent of. So I would never tell one of you guys you are going to hell because I don't know if you know the truth and just reject it. Understand?

But on a side note, while we are talking about this verse. This also applies to those who never heard of Christ or God. They cannot be condemned of a sin or a gift they knew not of. For how can a rightous God condemn people of a sin or choice they never had?

Quote
You've probably heard this before but I'll say it again. I'm about as religious about evolution as I am about gravity. I accept it because there is so much empirical evidence for it.


Mountains of the same type of evidence that says what has already been said. Is not moving forward. It's just a reconfirmation of what has already been claimed.

Gravity? Do you know it's source? Do you know what it is? But you believe it because you can observe it right?

Did you know that 50% of the claimed process of evolution is not observable and never will be?

Example: Can you show the millions of years of evolution process so I could observe it? Takes to much time don't it? Now why do you think that more than 50% of any evolution video is now animation? Animation is not needed where observable evidence is present. Think about it.

Quote
However, if you would like to provide evidence for your own position here, maybe you can be that one person I've encountered whose claims have no misunderstandings or scientific flaws. How about it?


I have yet to see any evidence from either side of the issue that does not have questions that cannot be answered, or a flaw that cannot be solved. But this does not mean that either evidence is not viable. Does sit?

I am no longer mod here. And I have left the forum.
My site: http://www.yecheadquarters.org